|
« Back
Big Venture Syndicates Creep Back In Later Rounds
VentureWire
By Russell Garland
Friday, March 16, 2007
After falling for two years in a row, the percentage of venture
deals with five or more investors rose in 2006 as firms scrambled
to back companies poised to go public or be acquired.
About one fifth -- 20.6% -- of venture capital financings last
year had more than four investors, up from 14.2%, according to a
Dow Jones VentureOne analysis of deal syndication.
Much of the syndication is occurring in third or later financing
rounds, where a large cast of investors, including hedge funds,
other private equity firms and corporations, often join venture
firms in backing fast-growing companies.
Kate Mitchell, a managing director at Scale Venture Partners, said
crossover investors, who back public and private companies, are
looking to get into later rounds because so many venture-financed
companies are getting acquired before they hit the public markets.
"They are aggressively calling our companies, and that's brand
new," she said of these investors. Scale, formerly BA Venture Partners,
is a multi-stage venture firm based in Foster City, Calif., near
San Francisco.
Last year, 38.9% of later rounds had five or more investors. This
rate, however, is well below the peak of the Internet bubble when
investors fell over themselves piling into start-ups that seemed
destined for IPOs.
The phenomenon peaked in 1999 when 54.2% of later rounds had five
or more investors, according to VentureOne, a research unit of Dow
Jones & Co., the publisher of VentureWire.
Deal syndication is a hallmark of the venture industry as investors
seek to share risk, tap into additional technical or management
expertise and tie into strategic partners. But many investors got
burned after the bubble as outsized syndicates, sometimes numbering
a dozen or more investors -- battled over companies' futures.
Typically one group wanted to shut a company down to salvage what
they could of their investment while another wanted to give it a
second chance, which often required more capital. And some VCs discovered
to their dismay that syndicate partners were running short of money
and couldn't pony up more.
As a result, VCs became more cautious about co-investors, generally
choosing to work with trusted venture firms with whom they had partnered
before. Also, the so-called tourists -- investment banks, corporations
and hedge funds that jumped into venture capital when it was hot
-- largely withdrew.
By 2005, the occurrence of late-stage deals with five or more investors
had fallen to 28.1%.
VCs historically have been wary of large syndicates in first rounds,
but the reins loosened there as well last year. Most first rounds
had one or two investors, but 7.4% had five or more, up from 3.1%
in 2005. In the bubble year of 2000, 10.8% of first rounds had five
or more investors.
"Syndicates are a risk, let's face it," said Michael Fitzgerald,
managing general partner of Commonwealth Capital Ventures, an early-
and growth-stage venture investor. "Anytime you see more than three
venture guys on a board of directors, you've got a problem."
With VCs looking to own 20% or more of each company they back,
there is a limit to how many can invest in a deal, said Mike Scanlin,
a partner at Battery Ventures who concentrates on mid- and late-stage
investments. "You've got to leave something for management," he
said.
New investors in later rounds often don't take board seats and
some syndicate members might supply only a small part of the round.
The capital requirements of a company also have a lot to do with
the number of investors.
Biopharmaceutical companies had five or more investors in 31.6%
of their 2006 financings overall, compared to 18% for software companies,
which are much cheaper to build. Communications and network companies
also consume a lot of cash and their financings last year had five
plus investors 30.6% of the time.
« Back

|